- “Patriarchy is a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule over the weak and to maintain that dominance through various forms of psychological terrorism and violence.”
The definition of patriarchy is probably the most basic
thing about the word, but it’s lost on so many people, being misconstrued for misandry
or men-hating. This should be understood in the same breath of the word “sociology”
as in the study of society, it’s really that simple. Because of outliers within
the community who can claim to be feminists, only to spout exclusionary
sentiments, or largely followed men who promote misunderstandings of the word, there’s
a wider disconnect between how people understand the word patriarchy. It
bothers me because it’s such a simple thing to look up a definition, between multiple
sources if you’re sceptical, yet so many people can’t even be bothered to do
that; they’d rather write an ill-informed angry paragraph.
- “To indoctrinate boys into the rules of patriarchy, we force them to feel pain and to deny their feelings.”
Touching again on ignorance, mens' rights activists are
usually in some form of opposition to feminists, not understanding that feminism
is very much on their side in many ways. Feminism is for everyone within
society, being made to behave a certain way because of a socially enforced
status quo. The main killer of men under 45 is suicide, which is horrifyingly
preventable. The patriarchy is an enemy to everyone, including men.
To summarise Bell Hooks’ view of patriarchy, she believes
that it isn’t an innate belief or set of ideas, but that patriarchy is learned
and taught to people from a young age. There’s a disconnect between the views of
genders in society because men aren’t as aware of the issues as women may be,
despite the struggles they face as a result of patriarchy. While women have pressures
such as looking pretty and their value being placed on attractiveness rather
than mental power or other skills they possess, men also struggle with mental
issues as a result of not being able to express emotions, what some consider to
be weakness. There are ways in which all genders are negatively effected by
patriarchy, and ways they promote patriarchal ideas, either subconsciously or not.
As a lover of classical art, it’s not unnoticed that any
nude I’ve seen has usually been female. Even those who prefer modern art or
more abstract pieces have an image pop into their mind regarding women in classical
art. The Birth of Venus, Truth Coming out of Her Well, The Venus De Milo, all
naked. It’s natural to appreciate a beautiful form but there’s definitely a
disconnect that promotes the idea that women are objects to be viewed rather
than the autonomy that male pieces, like Michelangelo’s David hold, despite
also being naked. John Berger’s quote comes to mind; “You painted a naked woman
because you enjoyed looking at her, put a mirror in her hand and you called the
painting “Vanity,” thus morally condemning the woman whose nakedness you had
depicted for you own pleasure.” This poster directly questions the nature of
women in art, not only as subjects, but as creators, practically demanding an
equal space for female artists. It’s also funny to me the image used, La Grande
Odalisque, was attacked too for going against the agreed upon style for nudes
at the time. Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres was criticised for the unrealistic
proportions of the woman in the painting from the moment it was revealed to the
public for apparently having no bones or life in her. I’m sure it wasn’t an
accident that it was chosen for this provoking question.
No comments:
Post a Comment